President Obama’s newest proposal
to a part of the health care sector has recently caused a lot of tension,
debate, and confusion. In his latest idea, President Obama has asked Catholic
hospitals and employers to now offer contraceptives in their health care plans
for employees. For anyone who may not know, Catholics theology has always been against
anything contraceptive. As a result most all employers who are associated with the
Catholic Church don’t include the coverage of contraceptives in the policies of
their respective employees. The government putting these mandates on these businesses
now raises the question of a constitutional infringement of our religious
freedom. It also raises a question of religious control by the employers.
In an
article by Kristen Powers on The Daily Beast she points out how the Obama
administration and our government have crossed a constitutional line. Religious
freedom has always been an important part of the United States from even before
the constitution was written. The fact that our government is now trying to put
restrictions on how a religious entity goes about its business, and so blatantly
against what the Catholic Church believes in is a slap to the face of freedom.
I myself am not Catholic, and am not against contraceptives, but the principal
of the government telling the Church that they must be liable to provide these
people something they believe is wrong makes me cringe.
Of
course in every argument there are two sides, and this is no exception. Some Americans
are saying that the Catholic Church is denying people their right to get the
treatment they desire under their health care plans. In a CNN article by
Jennifer Glass, she explains the hardships of working at Notre Dame University,
a Catholic establishment, as a non- Catholic during her childbearing years. Her
point of view shows states that it should be the right of citizens to choose
their medications, such as contraceptives. The Catholic Church seems to be
unrightfully controlling their employees by manipulating their healthcare
plans.
The
arguments above suggest two liberties being influenced here, the right to
religious freedom, and the right to contraceptives. Last time I checked, there wasn’t
anything in the constitution about the second of those. Even if the government
complains that the Catholic Church shouldn’t have the right to pick and choose
what they cover on health care, they should realize they themselves put the
employers in charge of providing health care. If they want to make all kinds of
medicine available to everyone they need to change the structure of how we get
healthcare, not tell certain groups what they have to provide. This isn’t merely
a question of is their enough availability, since nearly every other
non-religious provider covers contraceptives. The Church has never denied their
employees get contraceptives; they simply do not pay for them, as that would be
condoning or supporting something they don’t believe in. So if the government doesn’t
like that fact that not everyone has a chance to be covered for a type of
medicine they need to change the structure of health insurance, not force religions
to go against what they believe.
Tyler Shields
ReplyDeleteContraceptives are a very attractive thing to many of the people around the world, but Catholics do have a very strict policy against them. The idea of universal health care in general is a very hot topic, but this part in general is just absurd. What makes people have to have contraceptives? What is stopping people from going to a health care provider that covers contraceptives? If people have a need for contraceptives, they can find a way to get them. The government has a strict policy about separation of church and state. If schools and government are not allowed to have church in them, then the government should not be allowed to touch the church. The churches direct affiliation with these hospitals should allow them to make their own decisions based on their beliefs.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis whole idea of providing contraceptives within the healthcare of Catholic hospitals and employers confuses me. Obama claims women should be able to acquire birth control free of charge and it shouldn't affect religious affiliated institutions because they don't have to pay directly for the contraceptives. This I believe is taking away rights of religious freedom.
ReplyDeleteReed Hanke
What we have to keep in mind is that the real issue here isn't a moral one; it's one of healthcare. First, this mandate does not apply to actual churches, only church-owned and affiliated organizations which provide services that are not religious (e.g. hospitals, schools, etc.). Nonprofits that primarily employ and serve people of the same faith will still be exempt from providing contraceptive coverage. Religiously-affiliated employers who do not qualify for the exemption, on the other hand, and who thus receive government assistance, will be required to adapt to these changes. Simply put, the federal money these organizations receive already has strings attached to it in terms of how it can be used. This is just one more string.
ReplyDeletePlus, there are important figures that need to be taken into account as well, such as the statistic that 98% of sexually active Catholic women have used birth control (at one time or another). Whether or not they are going against their church's wishes, the fact is that they used it. There is clearly a need/want for contraception coverage then, and it should be there for women to use at their own discretion. Leave the "right" or "wrong" of it out of the equation. It's necessary, within government purview, and constitutionally sound.
(Note: That statistic comes from the Guttmacher Institute, a nonprofit sexual health research organization, and it shows that only 2 percent of Catholic women, even those who regularly attend church, rely on natural family planning.)
Some more fun facts:
DePaul, the largest Catholic university in the United States, already provides contraception coverage to its employees.
The State of Georgia requires all employers to cover contraception, including Catholic hospitals like Saint Joseph’s in Atlanta and Saint Mary’s in Athens.
Mitt Romney, as governor of Massachusetts, upheld and enforced a law that mandated Catholic hospitals to provide emergency contraception.
Republican lawmakers in more than a dozen states have introduced laws to ban Sharia Law, an assertion from the state of legal dominion over religious customs and practices of a religion.
Wouldn't a wiser course of action, not to mention one more theologically sound, be to simply have church leaders remind members of the tenets of their religion (i.e. no contraception) and allow them to put into practice those beliefs? The government exists to help people. What individuals do or do not believe remains their own business.
For a much better analysis of the issue, I advise you to go here: http://on.msnbc.com/wZgJUf